Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 1303 by percival.music.ca: Consecutive TrillSpanners
may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303
umm... what?
You're suggesting that we should document that starting a new trill spanner
without stopping the previous one will produce different output based on
whether or not the notes have ledger lines? Why on earth would that be
a "documentation" thing and not a bug? I mean, there's no way this is a
deliberate design decision.
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
