Graham Percival wrote Monday, August 30, 2010 12:02 AM
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:25:47PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I have to copy an old version of
lilypondbook into every new release in order to get
a working version. We can't expect users to do that.
I'm confused about what's going on. Are you talking about 1226
(which is claimed to be Fixed), or is this a different problem,
which was never added to the tracker?
This is a different problem which hasn't (yet)
been added to the tracker. I first asked on -dev
if anyone else had seen it:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-07/msg00063.html
It was then masked for a time by 1226, and reappeared
when this was fixed. I then reported it on -bug:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-08/msg00480.html
I've not added it to the tracker myself as no one
else had confirmed it until Reinhold pointed to the
source of the problem today:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2010-08/msg00533.html
So it should be added to the tracker now.
Trevor
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
