On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:13:16AM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > On Wed 04 Aug 2010, 20:23 Neil Puttock wrote: > > There's something fishy about the latest comparisons: a number of .log > > changes suggest broken regtests, > Sorry, could not catch that --- what exactly in test output[1] suggests broken > regtests?
Look at the log for bookparts.log and page-spacing-markups.log, for example: -Fitting music on 1 page... +Fitting music on 4 or 5 pages... ... -Fitting music on 1 page... +Fitting music on 3 or 4 pages... This suggests that 2.13.29 has a problem with the page spacing algorithm. Something that fit onto 1 page (in .28) now requires 4 or 5 pages (in .29) ! I must admit that I never look at the logs, so it's great that Neil found it. But looking at the regtest comparisons isn't either of our jobs; that's what you guys should be doing. :) > I've looked again in the manual[2] and couldn't find any relevant information. > (Probably, something should be added to the docs, too?..) As soon as you figure out what to add, I'll be happy to add it. (no, this process isn't at all formalized -- but, as this bug illustrates, it's very important!) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
