On 11 June 2010 14:36, Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> wrote: > What do you mean by "Unfortunately 'after-line-breaking is now spoken > for"? Actually I couldn't catch the meaning of "spoken for"? > Could you give another explanation for non-native English speakers? ;)
It means "reserved" or "engaged (to be married)"; I meant it in the former sense, since RehearsalMark has a default setting for 'after-line-breaking which can't be overridden without causing possible breakage (hence my suggestion to call shift-right-at-line-begin using a custom callback which will call the default after doing its work.) > Well, that explains me the "when", not the "why"... > But anyway, I'm quite sure I would have understood it. :p Purely conjecture on my part, but IIRC, rehearsal marks used to collide with clefs at the start of a system. Once this was fixed, it probably wasn't considered as important to shift the symbol to the right. > Should I ask the Bug Squad members to add 2 new issues on the tracker? > > 1. for this RehearsalMark placement issue at beginning of line ; Yes. > 2. to create a separate grobs for clefs and clef changes so they > could have different space-alist defaults. No. :) If somebody wants to fix this issue properly, it's best to leave it to their judgment as to how it should be implemented. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
