Comment #1 on issue 935 by john.mandereau: Enhancement: optional arguments
in music functions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=935
Have you considered previous discussion like the subthread starting at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-08/msg00233.html
before adding this issue?
If I was knowledgeable about LilyPond parser, I'd say "If you want to
define a
function with optional arguments, then define it in Scheme, which unlike
music
functions offers a function call syntax which allows optional arguments
without
ambiguity." and mark this issue as invalid.
Maybe supporting keyword arguments in music functions could be acceptable,
but that's
probably much work.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
