Comment #6 on issue 628 by pnorcks: Regression: markup \note doesn't work
as a TimeSignature stencil
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628
I should have said that using \numericTimeSignature is a workaround (last
time I
checked). Apparently it worked in 2.8, so I assume that's why it's marked
as a
regression.
I think we should keep the priority low, because a fix requires reworking
the font
loading mechanism so that we no longer need the Type 1 fonts (such as
feta-alphabet20.pfb). AFAICS, nobody knows how to fix this completely
(yet).
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
