On 2009-11-02, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:06:46AM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On 2009-11-02, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > I have
> > >   ac_cv_func_mbrtowc=yes
> > >   ac_cv_search_mbrtowc='none required'
> > > and also
> > >   #define HAVE_MBRTOWC 1
> > > 
> > > Dunno what that second line means.
> > 
> > Okay, that means mbrtowc() is supported and the preprocessor macro
> > HAVE_MBRTOWC is enabled.  So my guess was wrong.  :-(
> 
> The first and third lines mean that, yeah.  But the 'none
> required' -- does that mean "no extra measure are required, since
> we have the normal mbrtowc" ?

Yes, I think so.  If mbrtowc() is not found in the standard place,
then configure would conduct a thorough search to try and find it.


Thanks,
Patrick


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to