On 1/29/09 1:58 PM, "Patrick McCarty" <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Patrick McCarty <pnor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>> Mats
>>>
>>> This was changed by committish
>>> 3d90d1d4096a6fae5826445cd66e95d25de2110a by
>>> Joe Neeman on 29 Jun 2007. The commit message
>>> says:
>>>
>>> "use PaperColumns instead of SeparationItems".
>>
>> Furthermore, the SeparationItem grob is never even created anymore in
>> 2.12, so maybe its definition should be removed too?
>
> On second thought, that might not be a good idea. It would probably
> be best to leave the grob definition in scm/define-grobs.scm and just
> revise the documentation. This would leave SeparationItem overrides
> in their current state: "silently ignored".
>
Seems to me like we should remove the SeparationItem grob if there's no way
to create one. And we need a convert-ly rule to eliminate any
SeparationItem overrides. Let's clean it up properly, instead of leaving
detritus around.
(There, now I've used my big word for the day -- detritus. Perhaps I should
have said "cruft" instead of "detritus".)
Carl
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
