I think it would be good, to give the documentation-files names including the version like lilypond-2.11.57.pdf or lilypond.de-2.10.33.pdf ... But there would be the problem, that the links inside the documents would have to be updated too. Also it would be confusing, if there was a newer version, but a file wasn't changed. So it would be better at http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/ [index.html] to give not only the version and date as it is at the top of the page, but also the date of the last change for every single document (I think not every file is changed with every new version (?)).
On http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/index.html there is given a hint about the possibility to download the complete docu as tarball from http://lilypond.org/web/install/ This hint could be given at the top of http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/ and http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/ too. I'm not shure, what causes more traffic: one big download or the everyday-use of the online-manuals. But I don't know, if windows-users can use the tar.bz-file. Werner _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
