2008/8/21 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This seems like a regression. It looks OK in the > manual as that example has not been edited recently > and so has not been recompiled recently either. In > the file for my local doc build it was last compiled > on 27 April 08, and was OK then, probably with 2.11.44.
I'm sorry, but I see the manual and this PDF (and also my results with 2.11.56) identical. The warnings are not exactly errors. Another thread with the words "durations needed" in which Mats explained very well some related issues, can be of help. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
