In my mind, it's not really a bug. Because of the way the automatic
instantiation of
contexts works, your code is equivalent to
\new Staff \relative c''
{
<<
\new Voice { c16 e a g f e d c }
\new Voice { s16( s) s-. s-. s( s) s-. s-. }
>>
}
which means that the placement of the articulations will not in any way
be coordinated
with the actual notes.
We could of course discuss if the current algorithm for automatic
instantiation of the
contexts is appropriate, but otherwise the only possible bug here is a
lack of documentation.
As has already been pointed out, the proper solution is to explicitly
make sure that both lines
of "music" go into the same Voice context:
\new Staff \relative c''
{
\new Voice <<
{ c16 e a g f e d c }
{ s16( s) s-. s-. s( s) s-. s-. }
>>
}
/Mats
Jay Anderson wrote:
\version "2.11.49"
\new Staff \relative c''
{
%\key c \major %Add a key to correct programming errors.
<<
{ c16 e a g f e d c }
{ s16( s) s-. s-. s( s) s-. s-. }
>>
}
I didn't find this one in the bug tracker. I'm swapping out the rhythm
on the same passage and this error is created for each staccato:
test.ly:8:15: warning: programming error: script direction not yet known
{ s16( s) s
-. s-. s( s) s-. s-. }
No slurs are created it seems and the dots are placed strangely.
Adding a key signature fixes the errors.
-----Jay
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
