Sure - I will try the gub with/without the suggested output-ps.scm variant. But pleazzze..... send me modified nikud-foo*.files so they will have the font settings as you think should be tested. I really would like to see and learn how this can be effectively done.
-- yotam On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/13, Yotam Medini יותם מדיני <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hello Han-Wen > > > > [This should be added to > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=541] > > > > Sorry it took so long for my reply, and on top of this, > > I believe my experiments are not comprehensive as you need them. > > I will be glad to fix my misses, once I will be shown how. > > > > I did not use the gub binary, since I wanted to try > > for each case, both outputs of Lilypond released version, > > and 'mine' with the sign-change in pango-font.cc (as I sent on February > > 24). > > can you check the gub binary anyway? You can do the sign change with > the following change: in the definition of glyph-spec inside > glyph-string in output-ps.scm, change > > (+ w x) > > to > > (- w x) > > You can find the .scm file inside the gub binary, in > lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/ > > -- > Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen<http://www.xs4all.nl/%7Ehanwen> >
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
