Hi David, hi everybody. David's feature request has been officially added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=559
I'm both happy and sad to admit this request: I am happy to see that people like David care about making LilyPond an even better program, through such documented requests. And I'm sad because I have to warn you that, honestly, we deeply lack resources. Not money, not users, not enthusiastic contributors, but simply developers. We have only a few programmers, who are all very talented and dedicated, but who simply have also their lives, their jobs, their families, etc. However, I have to say that I'm impressed to see how easy it is to get familiar, then even intimate, with LilyPond. Six months ago, I was unable to understand a single line of Scheme code, and now I can even write some (simple but useful) functions, although I am in no way a programmer (I studied latin literature, so not really the same stuff...) So I fully agree with Carl on that. Plus, I'm always amazed to see how friendly and helpful our little community is always. So, the best I can advise you is to not just walk away. Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
