2008/1/6, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please contact the author of the festival stuff about this.
OK, he has just answered me. Turns out it was definitely *not* a duplicate, but was meant to checked if the two output files would look the same despite minor changes in the code. As for the festival-lilypond development, he seems to be waiting that the Festival application itself is a bit more mature (they're delaying their next stable release too :) > I have made a mistake, as the file was committed without a texidoc > header, but it may test valuable behavior. I'll commit some texidoc explanations... as soon as I manage to get my rsa pubkey accepted by git. Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
