Thanks, altered as you suggest. Cheers, - Graham
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:03:40 +0100 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you go back to really ancient LilyPond versions, you can get an > idea of what the example looked like when it originally was written. > For this specific case, you can for example look at > http://lilypond.org/doc/v1.6/input/regression/out-www/lily-1117114626.ly > which also only shows one of the cases, but has a separate commented > \score block with the \onestaff version. > > In those days, only the output of one score block was shown in the > on-line version > of the regression test document. > > I don't see any reason to keep the one staff version of the example. > > /Mats > > Graham Percival wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:26:50 -0600 > > Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Markings can be attached to (invisible) barlines. > >> /regression/bar-scripts.ly > >> > > ... > > > >> \score {{\onestaff \grstaff}} > >> > > > > It certainly looks like this example is missing that... but I > > don't see what it has to do with invisible barlines. Perhaps the > > main text needs to be changed? > > > > Or does "(invisible) barlines" refer to barlines at the end of a > > system? > > > > Cheers, > > - Graham > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > bug-lilypond mailing list > > bug-lilypond@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond > > > > -- > ============================================= > Mats Bengtsson > Signal Processing > Signals, Sensors and Systems > Royal Institute of Technology > SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM > Sweden > Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 > Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe > ============================================= > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
