Issue 348: \unfoldRepeats { blah music }  is different from { blah {music} }!
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=348

New issue report by gpermus:
%{
As long as we don't use \unfoldRepeats, both syntax forms provide the same
output.

In version 2.8 and earlier, we used to have warning message
"warning: expect 2 elements for chord tremolo, found 1"
but it seems that this warning was removed in the revision
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobdiff;f=lily/chord-tremolo-engraver.cc;h=60800064c91ae4dd91b60b35827377fbbafc4694;hp=dd1c040946f78a315f2ddc8bd357770ee567221c;hb=7c578820eb536c7ff135c351932e418f5bda1c80;hpb=db735aad5ee3f02cb82f32d8b314f1bcb7ec91ff

Still, the function unfold-repeats in scm/music-functions.scm only checks
if the
argument is a SequentialMusic or an EventChord, which is too simplistic if
the ordinary engraver doesn't distinguish between the two cases.
%}

\relative c' {
  \unfoldRepeats {\repeat tremolo 4 c8 } % Works correctly 
  \unfoldRepeats {\repeat tremolo 4 { c8 } } % Gives 16th notes!!! 
}


Attachments:
        foo.preview.png  2.0 KB 


Issue attributes:
        Status: Accepted
        Owner: gpermus
        Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

-- 
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to