Graham Percival wrote:
Brett Duncan wrote:
Nope - the output is even worse - check the attached png.
Here's the output from LP:
This means that there is an extra character somewhere. I noticed that
your example contained
\version "2.10.6")
with an extra ). Please double-check your input to make sure you have
a valid input file and try again.
Cheers,
- Graham
Nope, that was a typo in the email, but not in the file.
I re-typed the whole thing anyway, but it didn't change anything.
I've just downloaded 2.11.13 and tried that - it breaks for me (I'm on
an Intel Mac running OS X 10.4.8).
Output from LP is different for 2.11.13:
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Layout output to `easy13.ps'...
Converting to `easy13.pdf'...
`gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89
-dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite
-sOutputFile="easy13.pdf" -c .setpdfwrite -f "easy13.ps"' failed (256)
/Users/bduncan/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/../share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:37:1:
error: GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here
#
(if (or (pair? toplevel-scores) output-empty-score-list)
/Users/bduncan/Desktop/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/../share/lilypond/current/ly/init.ly:37:5:
error: syntax error, unexpected '(', expecting '='
#(if
(or (pair? toplevel-scores) output-empty-score-list)
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
scm_unused_struct* Prob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
scm_unused_struct* Context_def::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
programming error: Parsed object should be dead: static
scm_unused_struct* Grob::mark_smob(scm_unused_struct*)
continuing, cross fingers
error: failed files: "/Users/bduncan/Desktop/easy13.ly"
Brett
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
