Marnen Laibow-Koser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you mean by "further investigation"? My conclusion
I was referring to Werner and Han-Wen. By further investigation, I meant looking at printed output; comparing with the originals that Lily's bar lines were designed from and trying to discover where it has gone awry. >> I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put >> 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%. > > 250% came from an imprecise 300 dpi image. The 1200 dpi scan of > Lilypond's output indeed produced 190% (ok, 191%). Ok, but that means that LilyPond is on the black side of the scale rather than far off it. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
