Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Han-Wen,
I second the suggestion that print-page-number should be #t by
default; this is causing a lot of confusion to some people. Could
this be done before 2.10?
Certainly. Please apply/revert this change. The last I can remember is
that Mats changed the name of this property.
Hmm! I changed printfirst-page-number -> print-first-page-number and I
only did
this change in 2.9 and the problem appears also in 2.8 so I don't think
that's the culprit.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
