On Wednesday 04 October 2006 10:33, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Mats Bengtsson schreef: > > really > > well-defined which one and the program should definitely tell that that > > the user probably has made a mistake and the program had to make a > > decision on which mark to typeset. > > > > In your case, you know why the warning appears and you know that you can > > ignore it, since you only have \mark commands in your \global. If you > > want to > > get rid of the warnings, you could add the \mark commands in a separate > > variable > > that's only included at the top stave of the score, or you could use the > > \tag feature > > to do the same thing. > > It would be better if there were a check if the new event is equal to > the old one, and only warn if they're different.
Hm, then I'll define a new equal_p for probs. I'd say that two events are equal if all event properties are 'equal?'. This includes 'origin, so there will be a warning in cases like: << c8 \mark "A" \mark "A" >> I think this is desirable; it catches cases like c4 ( -. -_ -- \( ( where a user sends two slur-start-events by mistake. > Also, the definition > location seems to be missing. Erik? My work-in-progress macro-capable parser contains a generic fix for this, where I added a mandatory location parameter to MY_MAKE_MUSIC. Should I try to backport this before 2.10? -- Erik _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
