Sorry forgot the list.
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Am 17.02.2006 um 19:24 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
By definition a bug is release critical if it wasn't present in
version 2.6.
Hi,
in anticipation of the upcoming 2.8 release, I went through the
regression test document and compared the result of 2.7.35 to
2.6.6. The following list contains those snippets, in which IMHO
2.7.35 exhibits bugs not present in 2.6.6:
accidental-tie.ly: tie collides with sharp sign
ambitus.ly: no line between the notes of the ambitus
auto-change.ly: additional staff
beam-cross-staff-slope.ly: hairpin decrescendo collides with stems
completion-heads-polyphony.ly: heads are not broken over barline
mensural-ligatures.ly: no ligatures are printed
pedal-ped.ly: "Ped." and "*" collide with notes
phrasing-slur-slur-avoid.ly: PhrasingSlur collides with normal slurs
?repeat-line-break.ly: shouldn't the "2." volta bracket be open on
the right?
tuplet-properties.ly: hte 7th tuplet still has a number
tuplet-rest.ly: strange 1st bracket
volta-broken-left-edge.ly: closed continued volta brackets
Christian
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
