The problem has been solved and fixed in the latest versions available
at the download page. See the mailing list archives for details.
/Mats
Quoting Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
A thought (insight?) that may explain the 'strange' need for putting Lily
directories at the end of the path.
Windows (DOS) looks for files in 'path' order. Possibly there is a file
name in the Lily stuff duplicating something Windows looks for. Thus, with
Lily directories early in the path, Windows finds the Lily file and doesn't
like it.
If this theory is correct, it may cause Lily to find the Windows version
when Lily directories are at the end of the path.
Lacking a more credible explanation, I suggest searching for a file name
duplicated on the path. I don't know a simple way to do such a search.
- Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Haddon
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 4:02 PM
To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: LilyPond 2.6.4-5 installation
Mats Bengtsson <mats.bengtsson <at> s3.kth.se> writes:
The solution was to Right click on My Computer, select Properties ->
Advanced -> Environment Variables, edit the System variable PATH and
move C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin; to the end of the list. Then,
the PATH worked correctly.
Ok, moving "C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin" to the end of the PATH list
works; I have LilyPond 2.6.4-5 running, the Python scripts work, and Windows
is not complaining about missing system files/virus scanners.
Thanks for the solution!
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
