On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > lilypond-book in 2.2 will not choke on long files, if you break them > > > in parts using \include. Why do you need extra features, then? > > Can you provide an example of a file that chokes 2.2 lilypond-book ?
I tested files of up to 1 MB is size with lilypond-book-2.3.1, and they all worked, so it looks like that problem is fixed on recent versions. > > I would have thought the benefit of non-random filenames would be > > self-evident, and I provided an example of when it was specifically > > needed. > > I know, but I prefer to solve the underlying problem if possible. I still would like to be able to name my .png files. Would you accept a patch to implement that feature? ~ John Williams _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
