Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> In my opinion, convert-ly should be mentioned in the Tutorial. >> Now the information is hidden in the section on converters from >> other more or less obscure formats (and in the FAQ). > > What makes you think that users that already know lilypond will read > the tutorial?
To put it differently: I agree with Mats that convert-ly deserves more prominent mentioning somewhere, but maybe we can think of a (some?) better place(s) than the tutorial? Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
