Hi,
While I'm in this bugreporting/wishlist state, I'd just like to send another
minor issue that irritates me sometimes. Barcheck failures that go on forever
are not funny:
Suppose you have a long piece of music that has 2 staves. Suppose you do
modify it, and you make a mistake so that the upper staff's bar 1 gets too
short. Lilypond will now give two warnings for each bar in the piece, which
might mean that you have to scroll up though ten pages of warnings to see
what the it really is about. It should be possible to add a more intelligent
mechanism that stops printing the barcheck warnings after a while, or perhaps
one that issues new warnings only when there is a change in how far barchecks
are misaligned (so that we report when new mistakes are being done).
As an example, consider the following:
\score { \notes <<
\new Staff="A" {c4 |c1|c|c|c|c| c4 c c |}
\new Staff="B" {c1 |c1|c|c|c|c| c1 |}
>>}
It contains two mistakes, in the first and last bar of stave A. Thus only two
(or possibly four) warnings should be issued. But now it gives "warning:
barcheck failed at: 1/4:" at each barline of stave A, and
"warning: barcheck failed at: 3/4:" at each barline of stave B, resulting in a
big bunch of uninteresting warnings. The second actual mistake is hard to
spot among all these warnings.
One rule could be to not print the "barcheck failure at a/b" warning in a bar,
if a "barcheck failure at a/b" with the same a and b occured on the last | of
the same staff. But probably there also exist even more clever mechanisms.
Also, I have noticed that midi and paper seem to have separate barcheck
mechanisms, the paper's being a bit more intelligent. Included in my wish is
that both barcheck mechanisms should follow the same rules.
Erik
_______________________________________________
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
