On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 9:24 PM Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think we want to store the owner in the socket itself? As > mentioned in the comment, the "owner" is related to the file descriptor, > not to the socket. So it'd rather be the sock_user.
I don't fully understand this concept of "owner"ship (and storing a numeric PID is clearly broken, it should have been the message port or something), but netfs stores this in the node, and the comment in io.defs indicates that the related old-style async I/O flag is "per-object (not per-open)". So possibly it is the comment that needs changing rather. Sergey
