Hello, I did not see this mail. And I don't know why. It is not easy to communicate when emails are lost. Same problems with other emails too.
And btw: The OS is not HURD or hurd, it's either GNU/Hurd or just Hurd. Best regards, Svante Signell To: svante.sign...@gmail.com, 1029097-d...@bugs.debian.org Cc: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#1029097: PAM HURD patches Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 18:05:05 -0700 (08.02.2025 02:05:05) control: tags -1 wontfix Hi. I still have not received an answer to my questions. Also, the patch as written would not be sufficient to get pam to compile on hurd. I don't think our communications strategies work well together. My recommendation for getting PAM HURD patches updated are: * I summarize my thinking on the thread I started about PATHMAX and max hostname, letting people know what patches I'm open to and what patches I'm not. I'll try to make a response within two weeks. If you do not hear from me in that time, please prod me until you get a response. * A porter other than you prepares a patch. In that patch if you are disabling tests, be clear about why the test should be disabled. I'm likely to accept patches that disable functionality not present on HURD, but am not likely to accept patches to disable legitimate failures. Patches can be submitted as a MR against PAM or a new wishlist bug against PAM. * I work with the porter and review the patches. --Sam > > > > > "Svante" == Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> writes: Svante> reopen 1029097 thanks
