On 12/2/24 10:12 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
Zhaoming Luo, le lun. 02 déc. 2024 10:06:48 +0800, a ecrit:
+static void close_rtc(void)
+{
[...]
+}
+
+static int open_rtc(const struct hwclock_control *ctl)
+{
[...]
+}
+
+static int open_rtc_or_exit(const struct hwclock_control *ctl)
+{
[...]
+}
+
+static int do_rtc_read_ioctl(int rtc_fd, struct tm *tm)
+{
[...]
+}
+
+static int read_hardware_clock_rtc(const struct hwclock_control *ctl,
+ struct tm *tm)
+{
[...]
+}
+
+/*
+ * Set the Hardware Clock to the broken down time <new_broken_time>. Use
+ * ioctls to "rtc" device /dev/rtc.
+ */
+static int set_hardware_clock_rtc(const struct hwclock_control *ctl,
+ const struct tm *new_broken_time)
+{
[...]
+}
Please factorize these with the linux port, by putting them into a
shared file that is linked-in in both ports cases.
Do you mean having the following structure?
/----- hurd-hwlock-rtc.c \
hwclock.c hwclock-rtc.c
\----- linux-hwlock-rtc.c /
hwclock-rtc.c contains close_rtc, open_rtc, etc.
--
Zhaoming Luo
