Hi Almu, On 2/24/24 12:24 AM, Almudena Garcia wrote:
> I set the code as this way because it's the standard of Intel's guides. > > The guide explain that although most machines turn on the cpu with an unique > SIPI, some machines could require a second SIPI. Even some older machines > could need a INIT IPI before the SIPI. > > It's the reason because i wrote the code aa this way, following the advice on > of Intel's guides. This is not the code for INIT IPI or STARTUP IPI. This is just for raising a fixed, no-shorthand, physical IPI to wake up a different cpu. Please read what I changed in detail. If you have reason to believe de-asserting a fixed IPI is a good idea, then we can keep the existing code. Thanks, Damien
