Il 29/12/23 15:01, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
Luca Dariz, le jeu. 28 déc. 2023 20:42:52 +0100, a ecrit:
+ mach_port_t newname = 123;
Why initializing it?
the idea was to check that the value it's actually set, I'll fix it by
using a valid port name.
+ err = mach_port_allocate(mach_task_self(), MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE,
&newname);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_allocate");
+ err = mach_port_allocate(mach_task_self(), MACH_PORT_RIGHT_PORT_SET,
&newname);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_allocate");
+ err = mach_port_allocate(mach_task_self(), MACH_PORT_RIGHT_DEAD_NAME,
&newname);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_allocate");
You could check that you are getting different names.
ok
+ err = mach_port_destroy(mach_task_self(), newname);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_destroy");
+
+ err = mach_port_deallocate(mach_task_self(), 1002);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_deallocate");
+
+ mach_port_urefs_t urefs;
+ err = mach_port_get_refs(mach_task_self(), 1002, MACH_PORT_RIGHT_DEAD_NAME,
&urefs);
+ ASSERT_RET(err, "mach_port_get_refs");
You could also check the references of the ports created above.
ok
Luca
