Samuel Thibault, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 14:05:35 +0200, a ecrit: > jbra...@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 11:52:02 +0000, a ecrit: > > October 25, 2023 3:43 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > jbra...@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 03:40:16 +0000, a ecrit: > > > > > >> Or maybe GCC is partly at fault for the > > >> Hurd's X86_64 building troubles? > > > > > > It's not at all. Nor is libtool. > > > > > > I occasionally had issues in ./configure, too. > > > > > > You'll say that's "yeah, it's all about auto-crap". No. > > > > > > It's *very* most probably about bash, simply. > > > > Hmmm. I guess in the long-term then, the bash issues should be fixed. > > It'd really better be short-term, because currently we cannot really > trust the built packages: what if due to shell script misbehavior > ./configure misdetects features, forgets enabling some support > etc. That'd lead to subtle incompatibilities that'll be hard to hunt > down.
Today's gcc attempt: Comparing stages 2 and 3 Bootstrap comparison failure! libbacktrace/.libs/sort.o differs Samuel
