On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:53 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > llvm calls it i686-unknown-hurd-gnu (that was an intended behavior, even > when knowing that gnu tools call it i686-unknown-gnu), so we should > probably stick to that. > > I'd tend to keep it "hurd", because "gnu" is confusing for people. > Notably in llvm there are various parts called "gnu" which are the parts > shared between GNU/Linux, GNU/kFreeBSD, and GNU/Hurd.
That explains it, thanks. Damien, Vedant, please mention this in the commit message and in comments. Still, OS = "hurd" sounds very wrong to me. It's probably too late to change the LLVM triplet (quadruplet?), but perhaps OS = "gnu-hurd" (read: GNU/Hurd, not GNU Hurd) would be a good compromise for Rust? Sergey P.S. I wonder whether GNU leadership would have a strong opinion on this...
