Hello,

Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 03 juin 2023 20:20:24 +0300, a ecrit:
> I'm attaching a patch that does that and also documents the pitfalls
> (and also removes an extra block scope / level of indentation). It's
> untested, but it builds and the generated code looks OK (sc_reply_port
> gets loaded straight into %rdx, to be passed into __sigreturn2). Please
> test!

It seems to be working fine indeed, I have applied it, thanks!

> The stack guard issue must be caused by something else.

It seems so indeed. But it's not only the stack guard, but various TLS
accesses.

Samuel

Reply via email to