Hello, On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:15 PM Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > make no sense to me. After this statement, sigsp is > either 0x0000000000000000 > or 0x0000000000000010. > > If aligning SP is intended, the line should read > > sigsp = (void *) ((uintptr_t) sigsp & -16UL);
Indeed -- thank you for spotting it! I'll include the fix in my next patch series. As you can see we have not tested signals on x86_64 at all yet -- though exactly as of today there are now enough things working (the proc server, the signal thread) to actually attempt it :) Sergey
