Jessica Clarke, le mer. 10 mai 2023 01:44:39 +0100, a ecrit: > On 10 May 2023, at 01:26, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > > Sergey Bugaev, le mar. 09 mai 2023 00:31:07 +0300, a ecrit: > >> GCC was complaining about the mismatch in types between the 'fn' pointer > >> and the function pointers assigned to it. Since fn is meant to be used > >> with different function types, represent it as a 'void *' and not a > >> pointer to any particular function type. > >> --- > >> libps/ps.h | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/libps/ps.h b/libps/ps.h > >> index 192847b5..3e59c66a 100644 > >> --- a/libps/ps.h > >> +++ b/libps/ps.h > >> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ struct ps_getter > >> > >> /* A function that will get the value; the protocol between this > >> function > >> and its caller is type-dependent. */ > >> - void (*fn) (void); > >> + void *fn; > > > > Mmm, IIRC, strictly speaking, a function pointer is not the same as a > > pointer, on some odd archs such as ia64 it makes a difference. > > That’s not quite true. It’s not a direct pointer to the instructions, > but it is still a normal pointer.
At, it stores the address of the function descriptor? Ok. Samuel
