Sergey Bugaev via Libc-alpha, le ven. 14 avril 2023 12:23:00 +0300, a ecrit: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 12:12 PM Samuel Thibault > <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Sergey Bugaev via Libc-alpha, le ven. 14 avril 2023 11:53:43 +0300, a ecrit: > > > It's in _hurdsig_abort_rpcs, if the interrupt_operation call fails. > > > > > > Let's maybe not do that either? We're already making mach_msg seem to > > > have returned EINTR, which intr-msg knows how to handle. > > > > Mmm, yes, but we need to make *sure* we don't re-use the port and > > that it gets dropped at some point not too far, otherwise the > > server will stay stuck trying to reply. > > We should drop the reply port before waiting for the signal handler to > run, since the handler may block -- is that what you're saying?
That's a kind of scenario indeed. I don't know if it's actually exercised in the wild, but I wouldn't be surprised. Samuel
