Hello, Sergey Bugaev, le jeu. 13 avril 2023 16:20:50 +0300, a ecrit: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 4:12 PM Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > wrote: > at ../sysdeps/mach/hurd/dl-sysdep.c:241 > > 241 __mig_dealloc_reply_port (MACH_PORT_NULL); > > Uhh, who deallocs a reply port like that :| You can't pass random crap > into __mig_dealloc_reply_port and rely on its particular > implementation, which *happened* to deallocate the current port. > > Apparently FATAL_PREPARE in dl-sysdep.h is also defined to do the same. > > I'd rather fix these both to do > __mig_dealloc_reply_port (__mig_get_reply_port ());
That looks reasonable to me, yes. Samuel
