On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 10:02 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > Or something like this.
Or like that, yeah! On a second thought, I actually like Samuel's idea (ifdef MAP_32BIT): instead of only building this piece of code when the tunable *is* defined, we'd build it when the tunable *should be* defined (that is, when your port has MAP_32BIT). And if you get build errors, that is your not-so-gentle reminder to go and define the tunable for your port. What do you think? Sergey
