On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 3:41 PM Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Flavio Cruz, le lun. 13 mars 2023 01:42:12 -0400, a ecrit:
> > @@ -854,21 +849,22 @@ kern_return_t task_info(
> > task_thread_times_info_t times_info;
> > thread_t thread;
> >
> > - if (*task_info_count < TASK_THREAD_TIMES_INFO_COUNT) {
> > + /* Callers might not known about time_value64_t fields
> yet. */
> > + if (*task_info_count < TASK_THREAD_TIMES_INFO_COUNT - (2 *
> sizeof(time_value64_t)) / sizeof(integer_t)) {
> > return KERN_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
> > }
>
> I don't understand this: are we changing task_thread_times_info_t?
> task_thread_times_info is already containing exactly two
> rpc_time_value_t, this patch doesn't seem to be changing it?
>
Correct, I accidentally included a change that will be included in the next
patch.
> Samuel
>
