Samuel Thibault, le lun. 29 août 2022 01:21:23 +0200, a ecrit: > Hello, > > Luca Dariz, le dim. 03 avril 2022 16:59:55 +0200, a ecrit: > > @@ -88,13 +94,36 @@ typedef unsigned long long rpc_phys_addr_t; > > * expressing the difference between two > > * vm_offset_t entities. > > */ > > -#ifdef __x86_64__ > > typedef unsigned long vm_size_t; > > -#else > > -typedef natural_t vm_size_t; > > -#endif > > typedef vm_size_t * vm_size_array_t; > > Mmm, this has triggered a lot of warnings & errors about mismatches > between vm_size_t and mach_msg_type_number_t in userland hurd&glibc.
Do we really need to make vm_size_t always unsigned long? In gcc&glibc, they are unsigned, and thus size_t and vm_size_t would be incompatible, that's a bit odd. Also, it prevents from using %zd to print vm_size_t without getting a warning. Samuel
