Olaf Buddenhagen, le mer. 16 févr. 2022 05:14:31 +0100, a ecrit: > Putting it more bluntly: so the NetBSD source tree is large... And?
And it's a pain in the ** to work with. While using dh_quilt_patch is a very common way to work in Debian packages. Yes, that's Debian-centric, but we're at very experimental stage with rumpdisk for now anyway (yesterday I saw a mere 1MB read corrupt pfinet's text...). Once that's settled there's not supposed to be much patches left. > I'd strongly recommend to consider using revision control the way it's > meant to be used: No, using git to manage a patch queue long-term does not look convenient to me. I've been trying various approaches (branch that one keeps rebasing, one branch per patch, topgit) and none of them ended up more convenient than a mere quilt series. Samuel
