Damien Zammit, le mar. 10 nov. 2020 11:01:29 +1100, a ecrit: > On 10/11/20 6:06 am, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Perhaps add prints in the rump code to determine what really returns > > that error and why. Possibly it's really a constraint of wd0d, perhaps > > it can only be opened once at a time. > > I am getting EBUSY when trying to reopen /dev/wd0d in rump_sys_open().
So you'd have to use the same rump fd. That shouldn't be a problem, really. Samuel
