On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote: > > I just saw: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084 > > > > This is really a large step BACK: > > It's not a step back, it's just fixing something that is completely > wrong.
What is really wrong is that Matthias Klose removed the Hurd patches. Adding them back is a piece of cake for you (or him), see #894080. Next step is to send them to golang-dev for upstream adoption. gcc-patches seems to be a null sink. Sending patches there gives no reply whatsoever: Recent examples gdb and gccgo. > > Since you could issue that commit to _disable_ > > gccgo for Hurd, what about committing to _enable_ gccgo for Hurd instead. > > Because that would take *way* more time to do, and my current priority > is rather glibc. And why would I help you with glibc upstream? Give me a good reason for that :(
