Hello, Anatoly A. Kazantsev, on ven. 26 janv. 2018 21:28:31 +1300, wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:47:04 +0100 > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Anatoly A. Kazantsev, on jeu. 25 janv. 2018 21:39:44 +1300, wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 21:45:59 +1300 > > > "Anatoly A. Kazantsev" <anatoly.kazant...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Currently working on the following branches: > > > > > > > > - t/fcntl-internal.h > > > > - t/verify.h > > > > > > Next branches I will work on are: > > > > So do you think the two branches above are OK formatting-wise? > > > > (so I can have just a quick look and commit) > > Yes, I think so.
Thanks! I have pushed t/fcntl-internal.h upstream. > - verify.h is under GPL3+ but should be under LGPL2.1 as was pointed by > Joseph, also he suggested to replace it with _Static_assert. Indeed, _Static_assert is the way to go nowadays :) I fixed t/fcntl-internal.h before pushing. > And I'm sorry to not post this information together with the patches. No problem, as long as you do for next patches ;) Samuel
