Hi, On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:44:56PM +0300, Esa Peuha wrote:
> > settrans -ck /servers/socket/1 /hurd/pflocal > > I suggest you don't do that, since you'll basically replace the pflocal > instance for all the system, which might break already running > processes. Well -- assuming we auto-corrected this command in our minds to "settrans -ak /servers/socket/1 /home/something/pflocal" -- it would only affect running processes if the open new sockets, which doesn't sound too terrible for testing... Though I'd probably still rather do this in a subhurd :-) -antrik-
