On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 01:35:49PM -0300, Agustina Arzille wrote: > As a workaround, we could always use 'vm_map', no matter what, since the > idea that 'vm_allocate' has a little less overhead is somewhat bogus to me, or > keep using 'vm_allocate', but do an additional 'vm_inherit' if the user > specified > a shared mapping. > > What do you guys think?
I completely agree with using vm_map unconditionnally and I'm glad to see someone take the time to work on these things. -- Richard Braun
