Svante Signell, on Sat 09 Jan 2016 09:15:47 +0100, wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 00:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, on Fri 08 Jan 2016 21:59:56 +0100, wrote: > > > Unlink the old socket and create a new one with the same name. (I > > > wonder how GNU/Linux is implementing this?) > > > > It doesn't. > > Since it works on GNU/Linux how is it solved then?
No, it does not work. As I said in an earlier mail, GNU/Linux returns zero as if it was successfull, but doesn't actually do anything about. A very odd behavior, if you ask me. Samuel
