Hello, Thanks for your fixes.
Joshua Branson, le Fri 25 Sep 2015 13:52:25 -0400, a écrit : > This might be a significant enough change to require me assigning > copyright to the FSF. I don't think so for these changes: most of the wording was already in the documentation, so in the end you brought plumbing, which is not copyrightable. That doesn't mean your contribution was welcome, of course :) > I might continue to make some tiny changes to the hurd documentation in > the future, time permitting. If they remain tiny, then no copyright assignment is needed, but I guess you'll try to document more, in which case we'll need an assignment. > Would someone assist me in assigning copyright to the FSF? Should I send > one of the files found here? > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/Copyright Please use this one, yes: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 1719508..0000000 > --- a/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,15 +0,0 @@ > -*~ > - > -*.d > -*.o > -*.a > -*.so > -*.so.* > -TAGS > - > -autom4te.cache/ > -/config.log > -/config.make > -/config.status > -/configure > -/version.h You were removing .gitignore here... Joshua Branson, le Mon 28 Sep 2015 08:53:03 -0400, a écrit : > I've modified my patch.diff to fix the problems you had with the first > draft. Well, actually you created a patch which was to be applied on top of the previous one. Please don't do that, create a patch which still applies to the hurd master. > 1) Added my .gitignore back to the diff. BUT that means that I've added some > lines to the .gitignore, because I ran texi2pdf inside the hurd/doc > directory. If it is not advisable to add more lines to the .gitignore, then > I can fix that as well. No, it's fine to add more lines to .gitignore. Do not however add lines like: > +/patch.diff > +/doc/patch.diff since thoses are just your files, not normally generated by Makefile. Thanks, Samuel
