Hi, On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:52:01AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > El 19/09/15 a les 01:06, Olaf Buddenhagen ha escrit:
> >Is there any actual logic that could be split out into the audio and > >mixer translators? [...] > That depends on the sound API you want to provide to applications. > > Rump doesn't implement OSS, but rather "Sun audio", which seems to be > an ancestor of OSS, with very similar design. > > So if you wanted Sun audio, then yes it's a 1:1 wrapper. Otherwise you > have to convert. That's a bummer. I was assuming that all BSDs -- and by extension, Rump -- use OSS... > I find OSS more useful than Sun audio myself, so I hacked a modified > version of libossaudio (a conversion library included with NetBSD). How does that work in NetBSD? I guess whether it makes sense to split the translation for audio and mixer devices depends on how this is factored in libossaudio... -antrik-
