The grepping doesn't tell us whether those programs are using the interface in a way that's actually useful (either at all or specifically in the Hurd context). If the motivation is just to get more sloppily-written programs to compile out of the box, then a header that defines away the functions as no-op always-fail or no-op pretend-to-succeed or something else distinct from "implement as a faithful emulation of Linux usage regardless of the sensibility of such usage on the Hurd" could well be the most useful thing.
- Question with moving mount/umount logic in glibc Manolis Ragkousis
- Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in glib... Justus Winter
- Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic in ... Ludovic Courtès
- Re: Question with moving mount/umount logic... Justus Winter
- Re: Question with moving mount/umount l... Roland McGrath
- Re: Question with moving mount/umo... Ludovic Courtès
- Re: Question with moving mount... Olaf Buddenhagen
- Re: Question with moving m... Samuel Thibault
- Re: Question with moving m... Roland McGrath
- Re: Question with moving m... Samuel Thibault
- Re: Question with moving m... Samuel Thibault
- Re: Question with moving m... Manolis Ragkousis